"New technologies, new relations"

 

in the words of
Simona Borello
 
     


Rita Salerno (courtesy)

Italian version

trasp.gif (814 byte) trasp.gif (814 byte) trasp.gif (814 byte) trasp.gif (814 byte)

 

The message of Pope Benedict XVI for the forty-third World Day of Social Communications, which will be celebrated on the coming 24th May, is entitled: “New technologies, new relations – How to promote a culture of respect, of dialogue and friendship”. Internet is a ‘true gift for humanity, we read in the message, for which it must be accessible to everybody. The text of the Pope reiterates a topic dear to the Catholic Church.  He has already dedicated several documents to it, in order to highlight the fact that it would be “a serious damage” if it were not accessible to everybody, especially to the poorer and marginalised children of God. Moreover the Holy Father reminds us that “it is gratifying to see the emerging new digital nets, which try to promote human solidarity, peace, justice,  human rights, respect for life and for the good of creation. These nets can facilitate forms of co-operation among peoples of different geographic and cultural contexts”.

The hints of reflection contained in the message of the Pope are not few, and we have gone deep into them with Simona Borello, expert in this sector, with a degree in science of communication and a thesis of general linguistics on “Communication and Liturgy: for a linguistic analysis of the Homilies”; from 2005 she is a collaborator of the NOVA-T, centre of TV and multimedia production of the Italian Capuchin Friars, for which she manages and promotes the Internet site; she minds also the organisation and didactics of the courses on formation: “Evangelisation  & communication”, as well as of the missionary archive. At present, Simona Borello is a member of the co-ordination of “Chiccodisenape”, of the Meic Council and collaborates with the editing of the “Foglio” in Turin.

 To you, how does the online journalism face the religious and Vatican information?   

“I do not think that the journalism faces in a particular way the information concerning religious events, but I think that it confirms also in the virtual world the necessity of “selling the newspaper” that has characterised it on papery support. For this motive, the religious phenomena, the ecclesial personalities, the Catholics events are narrated in the measure in which they can give elements useful to increase the number of the passages on the site (once we would have said the “press run”). It is the matter of what is necessary for the maintenance of the information on line, thus, we should consider it as an unavoidable factor and, for certain senses, necessary for the maintenance of the plurality of opinions. In this context, as it is inevitable, we have journalists who operate with such a baggage of knowledge as to allow an adequate comprehension of the situations that are narrated, others, instead, have a lighter baggage. 

This type of mechanism, however, should be known and interpreted on behalf of the organs and the offices of the religious printing press, so that they may take care of and organise the communication efficaciously, in order to limit the possibilities of manipulation. I think it necessary not to undervalue the importance of a professional planning of one’s own communication, especially when the diffusion of the content is wanted.

A secondary mechanism –but not for this less important- of this type of situation is the construction of interesting personages from the mediatic viewpoint, who become the unique reference points of an experience or of an institution (for instance: often the religious information relates only the activities of the Pope, despite the enormous quantity of initiatives realised in the Diocese, by the Congregations, associations and movements)”,

In which way do the new technologies represent a cultural challenge also in the light of a critical and responsible use?

“Each means of communication causes inedited challenges to the culture in which it gets integrated. I love to say in a joke: those who happened to witness the birth of the printing press must have experienced a dismay similar, if not stronger, than ours.

The true newness in our days is the fast diffusion of the new supports and the easiness of utilising them. This makes extremely simple the access to the means of communications and, on the other side, “compels” us to a constant updating.  However, I fear that this updating may be done only from the viewpoint of technological characteristics, without questioning oneself on the cognitive and cultural consequences.  

It becomes ever more necessary to think about moments of specific formation on the means of communication, for adults who may have more difficulty of approach, as well as for the youths who use them in an immediate manner, often without being aware of the consequences. It is the matter of teaching them how to interrogate themselves with the “right” questions, keeping a certain distance from the cliché of common feelings, in order to go deep into the matter from the cultural viewpoint.

In connection with this necessity, I think that the consecrated persons can exercise a crucial role, by offering the testimony of using the media with awareness, and by organising moments of formation together with professional and expert people. It may be interesting to communicate that, within the Festival of Communication, which will be held in Alba, there will be two moments of formation on technologies, open to everyone, organised by the Pauline Fathers in collaboration with NOVA-T, the house of TV production managed by the Capuchin Friars”.

To you, which reflections are suggested by the theme chosen this year for the World Day of Social Communications?

“I think that by focalising the attention on the link between the new technologies, and the new relations, which they build up, we have offered a hint for an opportune reflection on our ecclesial realities. In fact, we happen to see the reiterated “apocalyptic and integrated” dichotomy coined by Umberto Eco in the 60s: uncritical defenders and prohibitionists, with notions often born from “hearsay” more than from direct knowledge. Therefore, it is time for educators, catechists, priests, sisters and friars to accomplish a course of observation, study and confrontation.

All of us must be pioneers of curiosity: we cannot say that nothing changes (it is never so when a new instrument enters the scenario of communication), neither that the things we already knew have gone bad.

For instance, I have heard the supposition that the loneliness experienced by adolescents is linked to lack of genuine relationships, because their friendships are all bound to sms, to   instant chat, to social network. Are we sure that this is an adequate analysis? Didn’t my generation. with the “fixed” telephone at one’s disposal, live the loneliness of adolescence? Only one of the then hit would suffice –for instance, The loneliness of the very young Laura Pausini- to remember that it was rightly so.  

Therefore, I think that our questions should have an ampler breath: How do the new technologies influence the relational modalities? Does the disposal of means of communication, that allow me frequent contacts with others, strengthen or weaken my bonds? Can the experience of an informative flux in constant evolution be in contrast with the building of stable bonds? Are virtual friendships equal or different from the real life? And so on and so forth”.   

According to your experience, how do the consecrated persons see the information on line?

“I do not think that we can express generalised opinions on this topic. As it usually happens with the remaining population, there are competent and passionate persons and others, instead, who are diffident and unaware.

During the courses of my formation on this matter, I naturally observed that younger persons found it easier to individuate the potentialities of the informative means, but I equally noted how the education to a competent use of them enables persons of all ages to use them.

For these motives, I have decided to offer my active support to courses of formation promoted by NOVA-T. The project is called Evangelisation & Communication, thought of to the end of empowering the communication competences of consecrated persons (and the lay operators), in view of the Gospel proclamation. It is the matter of an occasion to grow in the knowledge of the contemporary world and to individuate new ideas for evangelisation, in a rich context of communication.

The offered formation is articulated in three proposals: To evangelise with images, aiming at improving our knowledge about how the contemporary communication functions, to get information on the indications of the Magisterium, to seek instruments and modalities of evangelisation; to communicate well, to evangelise better, to learn the theory and the technical means necessary to project our own choices of communication; Montage, from idea to practice, to the end of experiencing the communicative and narrative functionality of the various types of video, a language very much appreciated by the youths”.  

How could the information on line be utilised by the religious to the end of evangelisation?

“Vatican II teaches us that the proclamation of the Gospel must be incarnated in history and in the life of the persons whom we want to  reach. For this motive, we cannot ignore the knowledge and the use of the “electronic” means of communication at least for two reasons. The first reason is that they are instruments used by many persons to share pieces of information, emotions and experiences. The second reason is that the presence of these means influences our society deeply: the processes of learning, the decisional modalities, the diffusion of fashions and so on and so forth.

Just to give an example, I shall linger a moment to examine the social networks, which, after a beginning on the sly, have imposed themselves as the major centres of aggregation on Internet. The characteristic of these places is that of putting the person at the centre, after years of supports foreseeing a participation through pseudonymous. This takes us back to a modality of “traditional” socialisation, though it amplifies in an exponential manner: we contact afresh persons of the past from whom we went far for various motives, the flux of communication with people whom we meet every day; we become friendly with the friends of our friends, seen occasionally in some birthday feast and no longer met again; we enter  contacts with unknown people because of common interests, persons who do not hide behind pseudonyms, whom we see “face-to-face” and whose milieu is known to us (interests, place of origin, friends, etc….)

Things of every kind may happen in these places: there is one who is present because all are present, but is diffident even of showing one’s own photo, another who exhibits even the photos of a stay in the sea or of his infancy; there are persons who utilise it as a political/cultural/religious battle-place, spreading texts and video, and still another man who wastes time making tests on “which Disney Princess are you?” and “Which historical personage would you have married?”.  

Being present in this context opens inedited possibilities: to enter in contact with all that persons share and consider important (their belonging to group A or to group B; the choice of a photo, the number of friends, the quantity of written messages); to create new forms of community around important events, that may be carried ahead in time; to experience a stronger communication, using more means of communication at the same time (video, photos, texts, chat…) 

These considerations can be valid also for other means of communication and are uniquely indications of a process: the “way” with which to use them is, in fact, potentially infinite, because the great ductility of the means of communication allows us to create original modalities, thought of on purpose for the reality in which we live. For this reason I think that there cannot be rules for the capacity of observing and experiencing a modality of presence.

Thus, the Parish Priest will place on the face-book the photos of the sportive camp. The boys can add their own comments and organise a new initiative.  

The friar will be able to send an sms containing a synthesis of te Gospel to be a fast memorandum for those who have been for Mass and to send it to those who have gone far from the weekly presence for various motives.

A sister will be able to animate a blog, soliciting the participants to express their opinion on questions of actuality or on existential uneasiness.

And so on with creativity!

(The mentioned examples refer to true cases).

How is it possible to promote a culture of respect, of dialogue and friendship through the information on line?

“The world of the “electronic” communication is a constant flux, in which it is difficult to find reference points valid and authoritative for everybody. What matters, therefore, is the possibility to create such a zone as we return to with pleasure, because we find in it updated contents, because considerations are taken and answers are given to left over comments, with  furnishing of interesting links.

These places allow the passage of a culture of respect, dialogue and friendship, through a testimony credible in time: everyone can freely express one’s opinion, all men and women are invited to have a respectful attitude (without hierarchies and without prejudices), all are encouraged also to be outside the given communication context.

This type of experience results, at the end, stronger and more sharable that the statement of principles that, though right, are perceived as vague and unhooked from reality.

In his message, the Pope exhorts us not to degrade the human being, excluding all that my feed hatred and intolerance. Could you quote a case on line, as an expression of the words of the Pope?

“I think that this statement may help us to highlight the importance of formation for those who want to be educators and evangelisers in the Internet epoch. Deepened competences on how the net functions and a developed critical sense are necessary to stay near the youths helping them to distinguish among the different types of contents, to verify the sources of information, to understand how to interrogate oneself before the different types of content.

Thus we can interact with the youths and discuss –in class, during the catechism lesson or the retreat, on a group of face-book- on what might be the idea of a person who is behind the video, who is maddening on you-tube, on the velina calendar that is in the home page of daily life, in the xenophobic joke that circulates through the E-mail.

It is the matter of using one’s own critical sense, knowing what happens on the net and facing its knotty points. It goes without saying that this is what it means to be updated on what happens daily: visiting the main sites, controlling the E-mail, peeping within one’s own profile…..these are activities that surely require time, but that are blessed in terms of acquired competences and hints for dialogue”.

Day after day we see the growth of Catholic sites in net. Analysing them from your viewpoint, as expert in this sector, which and what kind of merit and defects to they present?

“The quantity of Catholic sites in nets is truly impressive. I often happen to consult the very useful portal www.siticattolici.it managed by the curate Francesco Diani, and I find a composite archipelago. Near well cared sites from the graphic viewpoint, frequently updated from the content viewpoint, rich in connection with useful sites, there are “amateur” sites, with simple graphic and very rarely updated.  

I think that it is always necessary to consider the perspective of the presence in net, which implies the creation of places of different types. To give some examples, if we want to present our own Institution, we need a professional site, competently elaborated, in which we find a whole series of information that may help the sailor. In this case it may be opportune to approach a professional studio, as a long term investment, that might furnish an adequate visibility. In fact, there are too many sites of Congregations that finish by giving limited information, by not being updated, by being abandoned as soon as “the religious clever at internet” changes the convent. If we want to animate a young or vocational activity, a blog may be enough, availing oneself of the graphic interface gratuitously furnished, as well as of the possibility of sharing a noteworthy number of material.  

Another valuable characteristic is the simplicity in the construction of sites and of the blog: often we find ourselves in coloured sites with numerous chromatic tonalities, rich in animation, accompanied by a musical column (which often it is not eliminable), supported by a complex and complicated menu.

Finally, another point to pay attention to is the integration between the site or the blog with the other realities present in the net: the used  network, the used names in the instant chat, etc.”.

 Torna indietro