WORK TODAY
 
in the words of...
 ALESSANDRA SMERILLI

edited by Rita Salerno

                   (27 maggio 2013)

Italian version

 

  trasp.gif (814 byte) trasp.gif (814 byte) trasp.gif (814 byte)

Unemployment, job insecurity, illegal labor: it is always more employment emergency in Italy.

Along with an unemployment rate rising and the labor market too plastered, there is to register a gradual loss of employment’s sense. A condition exacerbated by the resignation of almost two million young people in our country, who now even more are diligently seeking work. In the light of this situation, it is to reconsider certainly the job training,  question today  no longer avoidable. And the proof that the occupation theme is now 'the problem of problems’ is also in the recent report, drawn up by the Italian Episcopal Conference (CEI) and presented in Rome, which offers some background lines for policy making in the direction of a new culture of job. We talked with Sister Alessandra Smerilli, Daughter of Mary Help of Christians: she teaches Economics at the Pontifical Faculty of Education Sciences Auxilium and Economics of cooperation at the Catholic University of Rome, and the new secretary of the Scientific Committee and Organizing of the Social Weeks of Italian Catholics of which she is a member since 2007.


In your view, how to overcome the large gap between study and work? Especially in light of the finding that the university does not prepare or mold talent for employment? And what can the Church do in this difficult time for young people looking for a job that is lacking?


"As in all difficult moments of history, we will see a new dawn, a new synthesis, which does not exist yet. I think it's very important to work for a school that meets the needs of today, who knows how to put together the intellectual formation and the meaning of work, work experience and responsibility. The charisms are a source of great innovations in history. If we think of our schools we must ask: are they innovative experiences? Are they different from other schools?  Have they a more for the education of young people? If we do not propose innovative experiences, from whom should we wait for?".


Pope Francis has repeatedly invited the youth people to live life following the great ideals. There is a recipe to help a boy in the delicate time when he compare himself to the work’s world and then with his identity, respecting the great ideals called by the Holy Father?


"Recipes in this field there are none. Of course, young people must be accompanied in the delicate stages of life when they have to decide what to specialize in, if they go abroad for a master, if they stay there. Above all, they should be helped to keep alive the ideals, even in concrete situations, which sometimes ask to adapt to not chosen, not dreamed works. The Church, as she already does, can help to distinguish between the workplace and the meaning of work. Recalling his experience of the concentration camps, Primo Levi wrote: "But at Auschwitz I often noticed a curious phenomenon: the need of 'job well done' is so strong as to push to do well the work imposed, as a slave. The Italian bricklayer who saved my life, bringing me food in secret for six months, he hated the Nazis, their food, their language, their war; but when they put him to pull out of walls, he made them straight and solid, not for obedience but for dignity" (Levi 1997, p. 85). To do well our work, even when we do not like it, we do not recognize ourselves in it, says about our dignity, says that we are something bigger and in excess compared with what we're doing."


How can religious men and women help young people to live these difficult economic times as an opportunity?


"First of all young people have many more resources than we normally think. They are adapting very well to the situation and do so with great creativity. We, as religious men and women,  should have a more positive outlook on young people and their potential. Second, in a society that does not leave room for the young, especially for positions of responsibility, we should instead bet on them, from their ideas, help them to achieve them. Finally, I believe that this historical moment calls us to greater sharing with the anxieties of young people and the problems of work: we can not live as normal the fact that while in the majority of our communities the standard of living is always the same (and room and board accommodation are insured for us), young people can not build a future because they are forced to live as temporary workers, or to emigrate ... Our communities can do much in the way of sharing. I guess buildings or parts of them made available to cooperatives of young people, funds for micro-credit in favor of the young, paths of entrepreneurship. We can do so much, if we accept the invitation of Pope Francis to come out, to the suburbs of existence."


There are many sides of the coin: those who have a permanent full-time employment and often fails to reconcile the schedule of work with those of their own family. In this regard  there are many women forced to give up the job especially when they have young children. How to counter this phenomenon of women who leave the labor market?


"The phenomenon is mainly cultural, even before economic (in particular for companies). First, the issue of work-life balance is not just a women's issue, but of family and work. It should not be seen only from the part of the family, but also of the work that needs to be built for families: everyone would benefit, even businesses. It is not an issue related to the care of children, but it extends to the whole of life. The time and manner of work have to be rethought, and many studies show that in the companies who pay more attention to the rhythms of the family, things work better and workers are more focused, because they have fewer worries."


Another aspect not to be overlooked is that of wage differences between men and women in our society. How to deal with and overcome this situation?


"Even here, the theme is cultural: the wage gap is not related either to the difference in labor productivity or the quality of the work. There are several explanations for this fact. I will mention only two. The first is related to the difference in behavior between men and women as regards to provide incentives for. Experiments and empirical evidence show that on average women, to culture or nature, undertake more and are more consistent in the work, but in the presence of external incentives, again on average, men increase their productivity. 'Le donne non chiedono (Women do not ask)' is the title of a book published by Il Sole 24 Ore: from the available data it would seem that men are more responsive to incentives, in most forms of payment related to productivity, while women sometimes in the face of individual incentives get jammed, as if they did not want to compete, and I think that's also why the forms of payment and wage levels over time assume a different trend for men and women.
The second explanation is related to the topic of gratuity: the woman has always been given the characteristic of living prominently gratuity, in the care, family, and even in the work. But a mistaken association between gratuity and free of charge, led to non-evaluate the work of the woman, especially one that does not pass through the market. The not right conflict between gratuity, meaning free, and monetary remuneration, has led to many forms of exploitation of women’s work, and especially of the nun. And it seems as if the woman needs to make a few things for her vocation and therefore it is not considered necessary the just compensation. There is a need for greater awareness of these issues, and the first that need to be convinced that you can work with gratuity and not working for free, we are first of all, the women."


It is often spoken about 'feminine genius' in the debate within the Church. But there is a specific female that can make a valuable contribution to today's society and mitigate the tendency to individualism, of which the work’s world needs be in large multinationals as well as within in large organizations that refer to the Church?


 "I believe that we have not yet explored the potential of women in the economy and in general in organizations. Also because up until now there have been few opportunities for women to assume roles of responsibility. The word economy comes from the greek 'oikos-nomos’, which means management of the house: I am convinced that the economy will not be renewed if you do not meet again with the feminine and with her genius. The female carries with her some primates. First, the primacy of life on the law, as demonstrates us the tragedy of Antigone, who dies because disobeys the King, who prohibited worthily to honor her dead brother; as demonstrate us the Egyptian midwives who disobey the commands of the Pharaoh: how shows us Mary in the pride of the Magnificat, and in the wedding feast of Cana. The female also carries the primacy of practice over theory. Finally to the woman has always been recognized the characteristic of living human relations not only as a tool, but as an end in theirselves. And today, in a time when the demand for relational goods (which for some years are recognized as economic assets) has increased, the supply of such goods, in the family, in the workplace, in the marketplace, it is also deeply linked the woman, and her 'genius'.
As for the Church, an important statement was made by the theologian Balthasar, who sees the life of the Church as a dialectic between two principles, the Peter’s principle, linked to the objective dimension, institutional and hierarchical, and Marian’s principle, or charismatic, related to the horizontal and fraternal dimension. Balthasar, after tying the Marian principle in the feminine, argues that without it: 'The Church becomes a functionalist, soulless, a factory feverish unable to stop, dispersed in noisy projects ... while people are turning away in droves from a Church of this kind."



The just released report of CEI (Italian Bishop Conference) on employment is also a proposal for a new culture of work. How do we built it up from where?


"The report of the cultural project of the Italian Church on the labor situation in Italy is an excellent text, even for the proposals that it contains, in addition to the lucid analysis of the problems of labor and the transformations that taking place. Among his proposals there is that to free up the labor market and to renew the work’s culture. It is proposed on the one hand  to re-evaluate the importance of the sense of the work, of the work done in a workmanlike manner as one of the hallmarks of Italian labor, especially of the craftsman, on the other to review some of the other categories, such as productivity, for example, as a multidimensional concept and not just of quality. The report stresses the importance of the enhancement of women's potential to help change the workplace and then to make more human the work. Finally, the art of job well done, should be taught at school, bringing the work in the school and more school, more culture at the workplace. Adriano Olivetti, Italian businessperson, had a library in his factories, and the time spent by employees in the library was considered 'work' in all respects. The Benedictine monks studied and went to work in the fields: from this union between intellectual and manual labor innovations were born. I think we should go back to this summary, if we want that the job today be not experienced as a nightmare by young people (between the experience of insecurity and not to find the meaning of what you do)
."

 

 

 

Condividi su:

Torna indietro