 |
 |
 |
 |
At
the beginning of the pontificate of the new Pope, who had come from the
Congregation for the Doctrine of faith, many feared a time of rigid
attention to the observance of the dogmas and the perfection of
orthodoxy. We cannot deny that this worry is so much an integral part in
the life and faith of Pope Ratzinger as to pay a relevant attention to
the right doctrine. Having said this, we must admit that the first
encyclical letter of his papacy clears many fears because Benedict XVI
does not trace back the essential nucleus of Christianity in a dogma
defined by old Councils, nor from an ex cathedra definition, but more
simply from Love. This is the rock, on which we must build the house of
the Christian community and of the entire humanity. This is the lymph,
which we must allow to run in the veins of the world. This is the sense
of our living and dying, of our believing and acting, of our being in
the world. Therefore, the intention of the encyclical letter is
essentially one of evangelisation
The fact
of having pointed decidedly at Love, leads the Christian Community
itself to get rid of superfluous pinchbecks to recuperate the latest
sources of one’s existence, the basic motive for which Christ has
thought of it and delivered it to the World. “We have believed in the
love of God” –this is how the Christian can express the fundamental
choice of his life, as we read in the introduction to the Encyclical
Letter. At the beginning of our being Christian, we do not find an
ethical decision or a big idea. Rather, we find the encounter with an
event, with a Person, who gives a new horizon and a decisive direction
to life.
John
expresses this event in the Gospel with the following words, “For this
is how God loved the world: He gave his only Son, so that everyone who
believes in him … may have eternal life”. (3,16). At the same
time, the Pope proposes this truth to the whole world, so that all may
have the chance of catching the fullness of its sense and meaning. In
this way, the Letter is not an arid academic or theological exercise. On
the contrary, it exercises a concrete and relevant impact on the life of
the world.
The author
himself declares this in the introduction, “In a world where at times we
link the name of God with vengeance or even with the duty of hatred and
violence, this message is of real actuality and of a very concrete
meaning. This is why in my first Encyclical, I wish to speak of love,
with which God fills us and which we must communicate to others”.
At this
point, it is interesting to discover that even a lay commentator,
Eugenio Scalfari, who is far from nurturing sympathy towards the
Catholic Church, is positive in his comments. “In an epoch, in which
fundamentalism advances, even among those declared as Christian or those
that use Christianity as an “intrumentum regni”, the recalling of
Ratzinger to the centrality of love, to the passion for love, to the
identification between love and charity, his force and meekness,
configures a very firm position of resistance against any call to arms
in the name of the unique God common to the three great monotheistic
religions, particularly the Gospel message of Christianity, of the
Catholic and apostolic church”.
Reading
the Encyclical, we feel to hear again the words of Antonino Bello, the
prophetic Bishop, who based his reflection of the church of the apron
and his own tenacious commitment to peace and to the least ones,
directly on the heart of the Trinity. Don Tonino Bello develops a
series of considerations on the statements of Vatican II. The Council,
in fact, presents the Trinity of God as “the exemplar cause of the
Church and of the human community”. He succeeded “to give up
himself” to the Trinitarian mystery. He easily became a close relative
of human things, as the relations among persons, but he proposed it as a
foundation of ethical principles. He adopted a mathematical formula
tending to explain the mystery. True, one plus one plus one equals
three, but this additional operation does not explain the mystery of the
Trinity. It is the multiplication of one by one by one, namely the
living one for the other in an absolute ablative sense. It is only one
by one, by one that gives one as a result! The “by” is Love, which
renders meaningful and gives sense to the Trinitarian life. This must
become an ethical foundation, a leader and a model for humanity. It will
be only one thing, it will band war from the dictionary definitively, it
will erase hunger from all human geography … only when we shall no
longer live one against the other, nor one more than the other, but only
one for the other!. I think that also the Encyclical of Benedict XVI is
in this happy intuition of Don Tonino Bello, which echoes the Gospel of
Christ and Vatican II.
At this
point, the charitable activity of the Church descends at full title from
the Will of God. A world in which we recognise the dignity and rights of
every person, satisfying everybody’s needs, is a world in which God
realises his dream for humanity. We believers must collaborate with this
dream of God, we must hasten and realise it, each of us according to the
charism of our call, according to the gifts, which the Father has poured
into our life. … Nobody can withdraw from this task, delegate it or
escape from it. It is everybody’s task. The Encyclical enters the
details and specifies an intimate and new relation between Charity and
Justice. It specifies that the competence and the duty to actuate
justice pertains to the State and is proper of the political identity.
However, he describes the Church as a prophetic and critical voice of
the society of men and women in which she lives. “She cannot and
does not intend to hold the politic battle in her hands or take the
place of the State, yet she cannot and must not stay at the margin of
the fight against justice”.
Joint
value
In this
action, there is a joint value, which the governments of nations cannot
offer. It is a value, which actually renders justice insufficient in
itself to satisfy the deep demand of men and women: love. It is here
that the Pope sees the indispensable contribution of the Christian
community. It is here that Benedict XVI asks the Church to watch, so
that the responsible political persons may not be polluted by the search
for power and personal interests. Moreover, he asks us to contribute to
the realisation of the common good with a creative charity, which
expresses itself concretely in the creation of appropriate services.
These services must be characterised by quickness in answering
new needs, by professional competence and sense of humanity –the
Pope calls it “attention of the heart”- and the availability of as many
as work in the field of charity to co-ordinate their work. This would
avoid the risk of creating double services, while leaving empty spaces
in our responses to the needs. I like to underline the indications with
which the Pope treats this aspect, to make us understand that this
passage is meaningful for the Love of God to be salt, able to
give savour to the human life and conviviality, reflected in the action
of the Church.
The last
aspect of the Church’s contribution concerns the task of the lay
faithful committed with responsibility to build up a society animated by
a spirit of equality, solidarity and peace. Here also, we are not at a
dutiful passage, but before a precise choice of the service, which we
must offer. The Pope makes an analysis of the times we live in and
suggests the themes of equality, solidarity and peace as indispensable
elements, which the lay believers must bear and witness. This is the
apron, which they have to put on. Benedict XVI concludes his message
urging the lay faithful to live charity as a prophecy. “It pertains
to them to open new ways of politics in their political acting. However,
I am particularly concerned about underlining that justice can never
make love superfluous. Love, and only love gives soul to justice”.
What follows is the realisation, the workshop, the laboratory of the
innovation, which they authoritatively ask us to set in motion, so that
Love may colour the world with a new hope, capable of concretising the
dream of the Creator.
 |