 |
 |
 |
 |
In
his latest intense book, of a deeply auto-biographic touch, il pane
di ieri, (yesterday’s bread), the prior of Bose, Enzo Bianchi,
narrates the world, the colours, the tastes, the life and thinking style
at the time of his youth. The reader cannot help being impressed by the
ample cultural distance between that time and today’s time, in
which we live. Yet, they are not separated by centuries, but by hardly
some handful of decenniums which, however, are years that have really
set the cards on playing. In fact, whoever is at least fifty years old
has witnessed the change of the social, cultural, economic scenario not
less than three or four times. It is the matter of radical and rapid
changes. Aldo Schiavone is right when, with this regard, he says that
the future has arrived too soon and that, on the other side, it has
never been given a similar short time to humanity –humanity here
signifies the man of the street- to adapt itself to the emerging
newness, re-building a right balance between desires/needs and
resources/means offered by the surrounding area. (Storia
e destino,
Einaudi,Torino 2007).
The disturbance of human freedom
is a proof of all this. In fact, the freedom of today’s men and women
knows, on one side, an exaltation and a fan of possibilities never known
before, but, at the same time, it registers an elevated and striking
degree of anxiety, insecurity, psychological blockage, which not rarely
produce “burnt lives”. The starting point, therefore, of this reflection
on the theme of the education challenge is exactly a growth to the
awareness that today’s living has become more difficult.
A boundless freedom
Life has become more difficult
because we have taken away the boundary of our freedom. In fact, in the
past each one’s freedom was limited/bounded because of the scarcity of
resources and opportunities, as well as because of some rigid scheme
with which the various states of life were interpreted (everybody knew
what it meant “to go to school”, “to give birth to a child”, “to form a
family”). Today, freedom has undergone a process of expansion never
experienced before, thanks to the products which the technical progress
offers us (medicines, cars, more money), as well as thanks to the
discontinuity of univocal models of human interpretation. This
last aspect is the result, in cultural terms, of the great ‘68 “cultural
subversion”.
The new technical discoveries
and the partly justified subversion of the traditional styles have
widened the horizon of our human freedom, but this has not been followed
by an adaptation. We should know also he fact that he who is offered
more is asked more.
To me, this is the horizon in
which we find the education challenge, which rightly we start thinking
of today with great attention.
It is true that normally, in
speaking of this argument, the thought goes to the youths, however this
is a theme that touches the delicate and complex moment that humanity is
living and which we can define like this: the alphabet of freedom
that today’s men and women have received from tradition is no longer
capable to step with the time, thus they grow towards a generalised
incompetence of what concerns the defence and promotion of the human
in man.
Every epoch has the youths
it deserves.
At this point it should be
obvious that those who suffer of this state of things most of all are
the adolescents and the youths. Endowed with every good, the emptiness
of rules and instructions shared at social level, an emptiness caused by
the inadequacy/incompetence of the alphabet of freedom of the adults,
they manage in their existence according to the model of experiments,
which are often inhabited by solitude and exposed to the spectrum of
nihilism (where everything is equal to nothing and therefore it is
equal to everything: to study, to have sex, to seek work, to set a
“barbone” (a long bearded man) on fire, to trample on a foreign
companion up to the shedding of blood….), according to the known
analysis of U. Galimberti (L’ospite
inquietante. Il nichilismo e i giovani,
Feltrinelli, Milano 2007).
We are all aware that it is not
so much the matter of emitting sentences, as rather of a new dedication
of all men and women to these adolescents/youths who are ignorant of
what is human, iper-affective and touchy, lovers of experiment,
stubborn and finally shut up and depressed.
It is obvious that the various
education contexts –family, school/university, parish, groups,
associations- must decline specific, differentiated education processes.
The following is, above all, a
reflection on what regards the world of schools and universities.
«You are of interest»
The educative challenge
questions the world of schools and universities at highest level. The
teaching staff is specifically solicited to re-collocate the educative
relation at the centre of its professional action, that is, the process
of involving the subjectivity of the one who must, also through study,
work hard to become the person he decides to be. The sense of the
educative relation is measured by the way in which the adolescent and
the youth catch the reality of finding themselves in the area of the
teacher’s interest, of his care and solicitude. It is in this area of
educative relation that the school and the university, through their own
finalities and specific instruments, will be able to contribute
efficaciously to the re-construction of the alphabet of freedom, which
today is very much needed. It would be difficult to undertake, without
it, a “humanly” profitable relation between desires and means at the
real availability of the single person, between needs and desires,
desires and illusions. Let us not forget how the market –with its
longa manus
of publicity and printing-
exploits unscrupulously the incompetence of the youths to discern
between what obscures and what causes the shining beauty of each one’s
personal dignity. We truly need strength, intelligence, competence and
passion to counteract the action that “these unique authentic masters”
produce in the heart of the young generations (perhaps not only those).
The exams are never ending
In its specificity, I perhaps
can say that the experience of study, with its progressive rhythm, with
its constant widening of horizons and daily confrontation with the
stranger in the triple declination of what exists no longer, of what is
elsewhere and what does not yet exist, with its dynamics of proofs,
verifications, recuperations and promotion, may truly create a special
space to elaborate the awareness of the greatness and fragility of our
human freedom.
In fact, study is a true
gymnasium of realism: You are you and not a God, you are even
nothing. You can build up something starting from yourselves, you can
and must welcome yourselves and answer the word and the promise you are
to yourself. You must accept the confrontation with others and with the
world, you must accept the sacrifice of trial, looking for its path, its
style. It is urgent that, in this, we re-discover the asymmetric
character of the relation teacher/learner.
Study is also a gymnasium of
“breath”. Life is not simple; you cannot omit to live even one of its
days and nobody has ever come out of it alive. However, you can and must
resist, looking beyond; you can and must trust the future time; you can
and must give time to time” breaking the tyranny of the present, of its
commandments and its idols. Only its projection into the future, in
fact, frees the human subject from the anxiety of auto-fulfilment, today
impossible in itself, and allows him to correspond to the authentic
essence of the human being, as a being that chooses to be.
Finally, it is a gymnasium of
“thinking differently”, of “thinking with courage”. Without realism and
without breath, the existence at the end lets itself to be dominated by
the merry-go-round of “by now…”: There is nothing more to be done by
now, I cannot change my character, I cannot take away this vice from me,
I cannot realize anything good by now, I can no longer slim down; the
world is by now destined to a violent self-destruction; it is of no use
to help the hungry, the sufferers..
In truth, there are more
energies in man than it is normally believed. Let us not forget that
each of us, with our personal physical and intellectual reality, has
come out of two very tiny cells invisible to the human eye. What an
energy we find within the human being!
Finally, this is the challenge
to the freedom of each being from always: being able to imagine oneself
differently. Nobody is compelled to wed the unhappiest part of
self and his destiny.
It is the same thing as to say:
The examinations are unending.
Matteo Armando
National ecclesiastic assistant
of the FUCI
c/o Casa Assistenti - Via F. Marchetta Selvaggiani, 22
00165 Roma

|