 |
 |
 |
 |
«The
advent of the information society is a real cultural revolution”, this
is a statement from the Directory on Social communication in the
Mission of the Church.
The
statement continues saying that “nothing of what today’s man thinks of,
says and does is stranger for the media; the media exercise an influence
on all that today’s man thinks, says and does”. “The Church needs
discernment and renewal to fulfil her task of announcing salvation to
this society, to these men”. We agree, but “a simple process of
adaptation or the research of updated modalities of communication are
not enough to remain faithful to the Gospel. We need to be faithful to
the Gospel in this new context. We need to identify credible forms of
communication fit for the socio-cultural context in which the Gospel has
to be incarnated, without getting dispersed of nullified” (no. 2).The
first “credible form”, rather the indispensable context is
communication.
Today, the
culture is strongly painted by the word “communication” and
communication itself is a culture, namely a way of existing, of being in
the world; it is an area of life, an existential context. It is the
“existential context of children, of kids, of youths, of the families we
meet every day, to whom the Church sends us to announce the love and
salvation of God.
We are
aware that the media are bearers of a new culture. They are born from
the very fact that new ways of communication exist, with new languages,
new techniques, and new psychological attitudes. The media offer us
formidable resources, if we assume positive visions and optics and if we
commit ourselves to understand always more the “born digitals”. In this
culture of communication, we must read and live the history of salvation
in the logic of God’s love for man. Above all we must “narrate it” with
the codices of mass media, such as the TV, the radio, the printing press
and the multi-media, inter-activity and Net.
Communication as relational attitude
The
indispensable context of proclamation is the “care” relation at the
origin of the human being. Do we feel, as consecrated, protagonists of a
“special mission”? Do we keep the desire of making him known burning in
our heart? Persons who are passionate and know how to communicate in
the line of interpersonal relation are able to proclaim. Persons who get
immersed into today’s culture with the aim of reading, interpreting it
and making it to rise, like an evangelical pinch of yeast in the dough.
If we do
not make the proclamation in the relational dimension, it will not reach
the other. Nothing would ever help to focalise itself on the consecrated
life and the evangelising mission in the mediatic culture, as the
re-discovery of the relational and reciprocal dimensions. He who
proclaims is image of the “net”, as called to welcome, to show mental
openness, desire of confrontation, ability of negotiation. He who
proclaims is a promoter. He who proclaims knows how to accept and
recognise every single young interlocutor in formation and immersed in
the culture of his time. He accompanies this young interlocutor in the
act of confronting the culture of the time with the Good News. He who
proclaims is available to be close to the youths, to understand them
with empathy, to reveal a deep trust in them and in their capacities. He
who proclaims educates the youth to take position and to express his
opinion. This is the end, the reaching post, towards which the
Directory on Social Communications orients us.
The
unopposed wave of history and of fashions must wrestle against the
Christian culture, which places Jesus, Redeemer of the world, as centre
of the cosmos and of history. If Jesus truly is this, no historical
conditioning, no cultural or social difference can prevail over His
presence. Christ, centre of the cosmos and of history, is the origin of
a new vision on reality, even that of the media, which is not against
reason, rather it makes reason to rise up from within. This is the
Christian culture, whose essential core is contained in the Gospels.
Culture is
custom, institutions, above all philosophy, ethics, arts. In other
words, culture is humanism. In this sense, the Christian culture
contains a vision of the person, of the world and of history in the
horizon of revelation, with the happy falling back into the daily
experience of this vision, to the end of realising an integral promotion
of the person.
This is
why “culture” means “cultivation of the person”, particularly of its
interior reality. The Christian culture is permeated with the presence
of Christ. It demands a deep theological knowledge, but it becomes love
and personal communion with Christ in His paschal mystery of death and
resurrection. Coherently lived, Christian culture is a vision embracing
all the realities –even that of old and new media and of technology in
general- with the savoury deriving from our familiarity with Christ and
His message.
How is it
practically?
Faith
transforms the person in all its personal, family, social dimensions.
This is why the Church and her consecrated faithful must give life to a
“being Christian” according to forms that change with the flowing of
history, but which are rooted into the Gospel message. The commitment to
“Christian cultivation of the person” –with particular reference to the
first seasons of age evolution and the youths- must have the means to
carry on one’s task, unless we want to remain only an abstract and vain
affirmation of principle. In fact, “culture” is a complex of human
elaborations, such as the productions of TV, radio and mass printing
press, in traditional and digital forms.
We must
define privileged courses in the parishes and religious communities,
such as formation courses for the operators of communication; promoting
the community hall and the cultural centres; creating more synergy
between media and ordinary pastoral work; involving research and
formation centres; giving voice to associationism and favouring the
commitment of the laity.
The
communities of consecrated persons are to interrogate themselves about
the new call to evangelisation in the mediatic culture, starting from
the youth reality. Where do we find the youths today? How do they
communicate? Do they project together their presence in the virtual
square? We invite the religious communities that act in the pastoral
field and in schools to assume the commitment of forming the families,
by promoting activities and alternative commitments; by helping in the
creation of a family schedule for the for the TV use, teaching how to
choose, accompanying in judgement and confrontation with values
Concretely: to know how to choose one’s own use of the media also in the
community; to read serious criticisms; to instruct oneself; to debate,
to judge and evaluate the most viewed cinematographic and TV products.
We must not be afraid to show our own way of evaluating the mass media
culture after confronting it with the Christian vision. Moreover, let us
not overlook the new frontiers of communication: internet with the video
sharing and the social nets.
The means
of mass communication, old and new, can be an extraordinary resource and
the Directory guides us to a major collaboration among the media
of catholic inspiration, in view of developing an organic pastoral
commitment, well supported by the organisms and structures of the
Church. Now let us ask ourselves, “Do we feel and are we operators of
communication?” To be an operator of communication we need a “pastoral
conversion”, but it is a priority. Immersed into numberless messages
opposite to the Gospel, we receive the call to prove that it is possible
to inculturate with the media without watering the Christian culture. We
must be capable and coherent. We conclude with the words of Karl Rahner:
“We must ask ourselves seriously and concretely whether there is space
for newness and future in our spirit and in our heart”.
Caterina Cangià
Lecturer
In the Pontifical Salesian University
Via
Cremolino, 143 – 00166 Roma
 |