 |
 |
 |
 |
Educating
in the faith is surely the most important task of the Church's life.
Educating in the faith means allowing everyone to get in touch with the
word of Jesus, and persuading him to direct its freedom to the
commandment of love that he has given us. A life shaped by love
can increasingly humanize this world. This world, in fact, isn’t all
completely humanized. Our way of speaking reminds us when we say
-without feeling to say a banality- "this doctor is human", "that guy is
human."
With similar expressions, we are not simply saying
that this doctor does not belong to the species of horses, rather than
we recognize that the human being of men is not obvious,
but it is an achievement. Here, the faith touches precisely this level
of life: it allows to humanize our lives and the lives of the world,
because it addresses to a life of love.
Moreover, we all know to love how difficult
is: even as Christians we believe that to love truly another person we
need of nothing less than the aid of God. Who among us does not know how
much effort takes to love the other in his truth and not just the image
that we have of him. Or how difficult is to be loved in our truth
without giving in to excessive demands that the other has on me!
It is not easy to love, but it is the only way that we have to
humanize this world, to continue the release of our species from the
kingdom of monkeys, even to convert the "monkey" -who still lives in us-
definitely to the human kingdom. Well, a Christian knows that we need
all the help of God to live a practice of true love. In a word, we need
faith, that is faith in God that Jesus revealed to us, who reconciles us
with ourselves and makes us able to love and to be able to meet each
other without asking to them to be my mirror but to be themselves.
Disappearing art
of ‘start’
However it seems that today we’re no longer able to
communicate this truth and no longer able to express the ultimate
meaning of the Church and its mission serving the humanization of the
world. Just recently a survey published on an important Catholic
magazine –Il Regno- shows that Italy, our country, moves away
year after year by a popular Catholicism, to put on a generic
Christianity. The figure becomes even more apparent when we consider
that segment of the population born after 1981: if a decline in
religious behavior is verified for all ages, nowadays in Italy, in the
case of people born after 1981, the decline is surprising: a departure
from the previous generation of more than 14 percentage point of
difference!
Young people therefore are among
us those who pray less, they believe in God less, don’t go to the
church, they trust in the established figures of the Church less and are
less willing to match their being Italian with being Catholic. In short,
most unrelated to any religious expression. And this -a figure ever
recorded so far- is worth for the female and for the male youth
population. The fact is even more striking when one considers that
almost all of these kids (over 80%) completed the process of Christian
initiation in the parish and has made use of Catholic religious
instruction at school for thirteen years. Then, we must rethink our
education’s practices of the faith, asking what is wrong with them, and
which roads have to make for the future.
The first thing that we discover is what the Church
did until now for education in the faith is only one side of the coin of
the entire work of education in the faith. What do you want to say? In
our society, until very recent years, the ecclesial communities, in
preparing their activities of education in the faith (Catechism,
the way of the sacraments, liturgical celebrations) were able to give
assurance on what might be called the familiar catechumenate
and the social catechumenate.
The family environment and, more generally, the
social environment contributed -at least until the eighties of last
century- to inject into the hearts of the children a sense of trust in
the word of the Church, which was a first, but precious seed for the
more explicit work which was then made in the hours of the catechism and
participation in liturgical life.
It was not intentional education in the faith, but a lifestyle, a
language, a way of interpreting the path of life, a witness to simple
prayer in the home: this was in line with the main instances of the
message of the Gospel and created a very effective sounding board for
the next church activity. Today this can be accepted no longer as a
prerequisite, if not for a few families. The society as a whole was a
deeply moral and moralizing society. I t was not sure the best possible
society, but had a greater sense of public morality.
What is the summary of this
argument? The point of synthesis is as follows: while the society and
the family, that is the adult world, have suddenly changed profile in
the last forty years, our practice of education in the faith (in
particular in the Parish) continued to provide a model of society, of
family and of adult that is no more.
Working with
adults
The multiple changes, as we currently have in the
families and society, and especially in the concept of being an adult,
have established a new model of education to the human, to the life,
that fewer and fewer reports to the traditional Western wisdom, with
which Christianity since the fourth century AD, had managed to get in
tune.
The watchwords of our time are no longer those of
eternity, truth, sacrifice, obedience to the bond of the law, of the
nature as an unchangeable framework of existence, all words "baptized"
by Christianity. Today the words are those of the corporeity, of the
moment, the democracy, the emotion, the technique, the experiment, the
possibility, words with which the Christian faith have to try new
alliances.
And then there are new phenomena, the "Rerum Novarum"
of our time: the lengthening of the average, setting a broader time to
be young, the political, cultural, sexual and women's economic
empowerment, the redefining labor, economic globalization, the
overwhelming input of new media, the blending of cultures and religions.
Hence the dismantling of a unit of culture and a culture of unity and
the imposing of a pluralism of fascinating but also disturbing
thought.
If so in the past - thanks to a shared cultural
horizon - to do the work of education in the faith they were at least
three: family, society and the ecclesial community, now that triangle
does not hold anymore. There are new dynamics that govern the humans and
which carry a new meaning and feeling for life. Not by accident that the
Italian bishops, in the document Education to the good life of the
Gospel, said about the "cold current" that is experiencing the
classic places of education: the family and school.
Of course, the actual parents are not, usually,
against the attendance of their children to the experience of the Church
(the parents lead them to the Catechism, send them to church, sometimes
to the summer camps too): the education is not through the instructions
that one gives to an other, but through the eyes: we are what we've
seen. Small people, in fact, look surprised not adults but what
adults is watching. The adolescence means, literally, "time to grow up",
staring what adults are staring.
Well, what kind of religiosity the adults, from
thirty years, show to the small people? In their lives is dramatically
narrowed the space for the meditation on the word of God, the frequency
of liturgical celebrations, the speeches of the faith, and especially to
the prayer. If the children do not see praying the parents and
significant adults, with whom they come into contact -to pray is an easy
way to "look" to God- it is unlikely to nurture the idea that the faith
in the prayer is the more elementary expression, it is an important
thing for their future life. Without the prayers of parents, it is
difficult to find the faith of their children.
A good reason, therefore, the bishops are claiming a
renewed attention to the ecclesial community in comparison with the
adults. The adults who believe and who pray are the first and most
effective witness of the faith that makes it more human and therefore
more good (ie to love) the life.
Armando Matteo
Assistente Nazionale della FUCI
Via F. Marchetti Selvaggiani, 22
00165 Roma
 |